Last week, or so, I got an email from a
guy's mother telling me her son, who had been tried for domestic
assault, was found not guilty by a jury. I knew that already and the
case was on my list of things to do that day, as the jury had
deliberated past deadline the day before. Later, the defendant
himself came up to the office to let me know the jury's verdict. The
mother's email was a little scratchy, but my conversation with the
gentleman was fine, if brief.
I wish more people would contact me
when their cases settle. Many times cases slip beneath my radar and
their conclusions never get reported. One of the main reasons for
this is how the court is organized and, to be honest, how I'm
disorganized.
Monday in Bennington Superior Court
Criminal Division is “arraignment day.” That's when arraignment
hearings are held for all the cases where there's no imminent danger
of the defendant fleeing or getting into more trouble. All the
arraignments are on a list and it's a simple matter of asking the
clerks for certain case files. The court also has an “extras”
list. These are folks who, for whatever reason, need to be arraigned
right away. Extras can come on any day, usually around 1 p.m.
There is no list of resolved cases.
Sure, some are scheduled for changes of plea or sentencing, but
they're not always listed as such and they come sporadically, making
it easy for them to slip past the media.
I've been working on a way to track the
cases I write about and perhaps it's time I doubled down on my
efforts, but it would be nice if defendants, or their attorneys, let
me know, politely, when their cases resolve. A few months ago
I began putting the word out to defense attorneys I have a rapport
with to feel free to let me know when one of their cases settles.
Obviously I don't expect to hear from either defendant or attorney
when there's a conviction.
We often hear that the first article
“gets splashed on the front page” while the follow-up gets buried
in the back, but it's been my experience that most court news ends up
on page two, even the initial article. Maybe by “front page” they
mean highest in our website's “most viewed” section, which is
dictated entirely by readers.
Yes wouldn't be wonderful if the attorneys and defendants did your job for you? Any charges that you cover should be covered from start to end. You do typically splash the charges and convictions across the paper but don't pay as much attention to the not guilty verdicts. That needs to change
ReplyDeleteWe follow up on information people bring to us all the time, "Anonymous." Why not use your real name?
ReplyDeleteIf you don't commit a crime, you don't have to worry about your name being in the paper. How about try and be a law abiding citizen and work for a living rather than complain about the way other people do their job.
ReplyDeleteThat's naive, Tara. Innocent people are sometimes accused of crimes they did not commit, and may have their name unfairly in the paper. Which is WHY it's important for the court reporter to follow up on any cases they report on. Doesn't help in the cases where people are wrongly convicted as well, but at least if the person is acquitted, it would be appropriate for the paper that reported the charges to report the acquittal as well.
ReplyDelete